September 2024, Volume 2, Issue 9

Author

Blessy Johns, Jayaprakash Madhavan, Grace Shirley E and Swapna Lilly Cyriac

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study is to compare the dosimetric parameters of radiation to the whole breast between the two intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IP IMRT) techniques, i.e. Inverse planned IMRT (IP IMRT) and Forward Planned IMRT (FP IMRT) with regard to target coverage (PTV) and irradiation of organs at risk (OAR). Material and Methods: Plain and Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) datasets were created for 41 patients treated with whole breast radiation therapy. CT simulation and treatment is performed using deep inspiratory breath hold technique (DIBH). Radiotherapy treatment Planning is done using Eclipse Treatment Planning System (version 13.7) with a prescription dose of 40 Gy in 15#. The developed treatment plans were subjected to objective comparison of PTV and OARs using dose volume histograms (DVH). Results: IP IMRT plans provided better coverage (99.5% vs 97.6%), comparable though higher maximum dose (Dmax 45.0 VS 44.1 Gy), higher hot spot (PTV105% 49.2 vs 33), lower volumes receiving 20, 25, 30 Gy (V20, V25, V30) for heart, more homogeneous (homogeneity index 0.10 vs. 0.14) and conformal dose distribution (conformity Index 1.0 vs 0.98) compared to FP IMRT. Regarding OAR dosimetry it is observed that FP IMRT showed reduced mean dose to Coronary artery (LADCA), Contralateral Lung (CL), Contralateral breast (CB) along with reduction in low dose region (V5) to all OARs under study. It was also observed that Monitor units used and planning time were lower for FP IMRT. Conclusion: On weighing different dosimetric factors, both the techniques have displayed their own advantages and disadvantages. Choosing a planning technique needs to be customized taking into consideration various factors such as breast topography, size and volumes of breast, availability of expertise planning skills and resources.